As I've started my 100 day challenge, I thought I'd do a quick comparison of the data from my pedometer and from my activity monitor. I use a Polar A360. I've posted some stuff about it before, so I won't go into too much detail here.
The A360 takes all your activity and converts it into "equivalent steps". I'm guessing it uses some sort of algorithm to do this. So, when I play tennis for example, it will show a higher step count than when I go for a walk, not because I've necessarily taken more steps but because of the way it converts movement into steps. This shows up in the statistics. Interestingly, one day the A360 under-recorded steps compared to the pedometer rather than over-recording (although over and under recording aren't exactly the best way to describe what it does!).
Anyway, using the 14 days from August, here's what the comparative data looks like:
Pedometer:
Total Steps: 192525
Average per day: 13751
Highest: 24750
Lowest: 10458
A360:
Total Steps: 233407
Average per day: 16672
Highest: 28693
Lowest: 10686
Interestingly, the day the A360 recorded fewer steps than the pedometer was the day I intentionally went for a walk and set my wristband to monitor that activity (i.e. to log the walk as a training event). It's also partly why I'm undecided about how best to monitor myself during the 100 days. At the moment I simply use my pedometer and make sure it hits 10k each day.
I guess in the end the data just underlines that you need to decide what you want to measure and then choose the appropriate method and equipment to do that job.
No comments:
Post a Comment